Credibility Review
Credibility Score
65%
Moderate Credibility
FUD Elements Detected
Attackers are abusing X’s generative AI bot Grok to spread phishing links
Factual
This statement presents a verifiable fact about the misuse of Grok for phishing.
Severity: Low
They are able to embed their malicious link in the small ‘from’ field below the video
Factual
This describes a specific method used by attackers, which can be verified.
Severity: Low
There really is an unlimited number of variations on this threat
Uncertainty
This implies speculation about the potential for various attacks without providing specific examples.
Severity: Medium
You simply can’t assume that the LLM has not been tricked by a resourceful threat actor
Doubt
This statement undermines trust in generative AI tools without providing concrete evidence.
Severity: High
Malicious prompts can be hidden from view – in white text, metadata or even Unicode characters
Fear
This exaggerates the threat by suggesting that malicious content can be easily concealed, provoking anxiety.
Severity: High
Any GenAI that searches publicly available data to provide you with answers is also vulnerable to processing data that is 'poisoned'
Fear
This statement raises alarm about the vulnerabilities of generative AI tools without sufficient context or evidence.
Severity: High
Overall Assessment
The article contains a mix of factual information and elements of fear, uncertainty, and doubt, leading to an overall alarming tone.